I sometimes feel like starting analysis of articles with “When I were a lad…” but I’ll resist this time. In my (last millennium) school days we used to have a lesson called ‘Current Affairs’ where we’d discuss what was in the news. The bit I appreciated the most was being taught to think “Why am I being told this?” and realising that the answer was usually because someone wants to sell me something (an idea, a product, a newspaper…). That cynicism has stayed with me. It would be good to see our children question what the see in the media in the same way…:
Brussels wants to rely on online platforms, fact-checkers and “strategic communication” to combat COVID-19 disinformation, according to a draft text seen by POLITICO.
In the draft text, the European Commission mentions disinformation campaigns from foreign actors “in particular China and Russia” as well as misleading health care information, conspiracy theories — including on 5G —, illegal hate speech, consumer fraud and cybercrime as challenges arising during the coronavirus pandemic.
Commission Vice President Věra Jourová and the EU’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell will present a communication Wednesday on coronavirus-related disinformation that will set the scene for a longer-term approach in the European Democracy Action Plan and the Digital Services Act. Those two packages of proposals on online content are expected to be published by the end of the year.
As reported earlier by POLITICO, tech companies who have signed the Commission’s code of practice on disinformation will also be asked to provide monthly updates on how they’re tackling misinformation connected to COVID-19.
The nonbinding communication could still change before its adoption.
To counter propaganda efforts by foreign actors, the Commission wants to strengthen its own communication efforts within and outside the EU. “It’s high time we stepped up on this and not allow others, such as China, to occupy the space,” Jourová said last week.
The text recommends to “further invest” in strategic communication capabilities and step up the use of existing mechanisms, including through the Commission’s cooperation channels with member countries and the EEAS Strategic Communications Task Forces. These units have struggled for funding in recent years as many EU countries have bickered over their role in combatting state-backed disinformation, particularly coming from Russia.
EU delegations and the Commission’s representations in the EU should play a more active role in national public debates. The Commission also pledges to facilitate the exchange of best practices on specific issues relating to disinformation, such as micro-targeting, and intensify existing partnerships including with the G7 and NATO.
Platforms and media literacy
The reports from platforms would cover initiatives to promote authoritative content at EU and member country level; initiatives and tools to inform users when they interact with disinformation; information on efforts to manipulate the platform; and data on flows of advertising linked to COVID-19.
In addition to Facebook, Google and Twitter, reporting should be broadened to other platforms which are not currently signatories of the Commission’s code of practice on disinformation, according to the draft text, which mentions Chinese app TikTok and Facebook’s WhatsApp.
The Commission also wants online platforms to cooperate more closely with researchers and fact-checkers, as well as agree with the newly established European Digital Media Observatory on a framework to provide academic researchers with privacy-protected access to data.
In the text, Brussels urges caution to safeguard freedom of expression and pledges to “closely monitor the impact of emergency measures on EU law and values.” But the communication stops short of mentioning any EU country, even as Hungary recently adopted a new law under which people who spread what are viewed as untrue or distorted facts can face several years in jail.
The Commission in the text insists on the importance of media literacy and considers actions to raise awareness and critical thinking among young people by “building on the potential of social media and influencers.” During the pandemic, Finland relied on social media influencers to provide reliable information to people who do not rely on traditional media, while the Commission already funds media literacy projects across the 27-country bloc.